|
Home | Journals | Author Services | About | Submit Article |
 Academic Publishing |
Peer Review PolicyThe practice of peer review is to ensure that only good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards Review Policy and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. Initial manuscript evaluation The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review. Type of Peer Review Policy employs double blind reviewing, where both the referee and author remain anonymous throughout the process. How the referee is selected Whenever possible, referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated. Referee reports Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work. Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript. How long does the review process take? The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees. Should the referee's reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. The Editor's decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the referees, which usually includes verbatim comments by the referees. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial referees who may then request another revision of a manuscript. Final report A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees. Editor's Decision is final Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. Last Modified: Feb 04, 2026 12:28 |
| Most Viewed Articles | Most Cited Articles | ||
Case Report IMAGING FEATURES OF AN ADVANCED EMBRYONAL ORBITAL RHABDOMYOSARCOMA IN A PEDIATRIC CASE Research Article Research Article Physicochemical properties and Lipid profile of Jyotishmati (Celastrus Paniculatus) Review Article The imbalance of body electrolytes in HIV patients using highly active antiretroviral therapy Case Report Effect of Fomentation on pulmonary function test in Post- COVID Dyspnea – a case report Case Report |
|
All content on this site: Copyright © 2023-2026 wisdomgale, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the Creative Commons licensing terms apply. We use cookies that are necessary to make our site work. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookie. |
Statements & Policies Authorship Policy Copyright Info Digital Archiving Editorial And Peer Review Processes Editorial Policy Human And Animal Protection Policy Open Access Policy Peer Review Policy Plagiarism Policy Publication Ethics Policy Self-archiving Policy |
Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy About us Contact Us |
Author Tools eJM - Journal Management System Grammatical Checking DOI for Articles Journal Ads BiblioMed Database eJPort - Online Submission System |
|
